|
It is never I that enters. The remote aspects of the infra-ultrastructure are hidden from the private, anchored space of the operator. The Obvion of I, the I sup|posed at the screen is not the navigator and negotiator of the delimited labyrinth of the network, the underworld. The screen-bound avatar is a micromental reproduction of the trans|missive hero-agent, which is already a trans|posed Cell.f of self -- the re:turned hero-nike of an encoded agent. Though the delivery-machine feels no-thing, the mediation, all co-operation between the I and apparatus is con.sensual; in that, the machine and operator are mutually capable of transliterating the cryptic processes of attachment into bi.narrative faciality -- separate from the I, though rendered by/as it. |
|
|